Topics: Auditing, Internal audit, Audit Pages: 16 (8009 words) Published: November 4, 2014
Scientific Annals
of the „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iaşi
Economic Sciences
59 (1), 2012, 79-94
DOI 10.2478/v10316-012-0005-x

Victoria STANCIU
Academy of Economic Studies of Bucharest
Bucharest, Romania

Over the past few years the companies had to face a difficult economic climate. In this instable and sometimes unpredictable environment, organizations have changed their strategies, building and applying new business models based on globalization and new technologies, understanding that traditional business approaches may not be effective in the new economic circumstances. The complexity of the activities performed determined the emergence of new risks. A particular characteristic for the crisis years is also a higher potential risk of fraud and fraudulent financial reporting. Fraud is a risk that should not be ignored and many companies have recognized that the impact of fraud is increased in the past years. Senior managers have become more concern on fraud risk and try to understand how their companies might be vulnerable to fraud.

The objective of this paper is to examine the fraud phenomenon and fraud vectors aiming at identifying appropriate prevention actions. The author focuses on the internal audit role in fraud prevention, identification and investigation. Our research results conclude on means of improving fraud risk monitor and prevention, providing suggestions for proactive approaches in control processes’ improvement. Keywords: fraud, fraudulent financial reporting, red flags, internal audit JEL classification: M42, G34

Studies on accounting field have showed the seriousness of fraud problem and its increasing trends. Researches within this area have emphasized the fraud models and suggested how to prevent, detect and investigate frauds. Strong corporate governance and a solid corporate culture are important pillars for fraud prevention. The companies are facing this challenge being aware that the key stays in a robust fraud risk management culture and senior management endorsement for a strong approach to fraud management and ethical culture within the organization. Companies have to put in place robust systems and controls in order to prevent and detect fraud. Failure in fraud detection exposes companies to significant reputational and financial damage. In crisis years, fraudulent financial reporting represents another growing risk. The accounting and financial audit professional literature have analyzed in detail the well known

Download Date | 11/4/14 4:50 PM


Victoria STANCIU

cases such as Enron, WoldCom, Xerox in US and the European fraudulent reporting cases as for example Vivendi and Parmalat. The researches in accounting and forensic accounting have emphasized the nature of frauds and the causes that have facilitated them. The final objective of all those studies was to draw the professional framework for fraud prevention, detection and investigation and recommend how to recognize and react when alert signs arise.

Important results in the fraud research were publishes by Donald Cressey. Cressey explains the necessary frame for fraud: opportunity, pressure/incentive and rationalization. If any one of the three elements is missing, fraud may not occur. To succeed, the fraudster has to prove his ability and knowledge to commit fraud. Incentive (also called ― pressure‖) can

take various forms; but any of these determine the perpetrator to seek gains via financial fraud. It should be noticed that opportunity and incentive only exist or they don’t or, in other words, exists or they potential exists. In opposite, rationalization depends on the individual and the circumstances he/she is facing.

In periods with difficult financial and economic climate, the fraud risk is increasing and there is also a higher potential risk for registering fraudulent...

References: AICPA, Management Override of Internal Controls: The Achilles ' Heel of Fraud Prevention The Audit Committee and Oversight of Financial Reporting, 2005, available on-line at
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), 2002, Report to on Occupational Fraud and
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), 2010, Report to the nations on occupational
fraud and abuse
Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., and Wright A., 2004, The Corporate Governance Mosaic And
Financial Reporting Quality
COSO, 2010, Fraudulent financial reporting 1998-2007. An analysis of U.S. public Corporations, available on-line at Accessed on 25th of January 2010.
Dorminey, D. and al., 2010, Beyond the Fraud Triangle, CPA Jurnal, July 2010, available at, 15th of March 2011.
IFAC, 2009, Manual de Standarde Internaţionale de Audit şi Control de Calitate. Audit financiar
KPMG, 2003, KPMG Forensic -Fraud Survey 2003, available on-line at
KPMG, 2011, KPMG analysis of global patterns of fraud. Who is the typical fraudster?2011,
available on line at Articles Publications/Special-interests/Documents/fraudster%20EN%20web1.pdf
Laflèche, D., Elzinga, D., Seeto, R., 2010, Trust and occupational fraud. How to trust is just as
important as whom to trust
Oversight Systems, 2007, The 2007 Oversight System Report on Corporate Fraud, available online at
OECD, 2009, The Corporate Governance Lessons from the Financial Crisis. OECD 2009 Prepublication version for Vol. 2009/1. Available on-line at
PwC, 2007, Internal audit 2012. A study examining the future of internal auditing and the potential decline of controls-centric approach. PriceWaterhouseCoopers, 2007, Available online at
Silver S, Fleming A.S, and. Riley, R. Jr., 2008, Preventing and Detecting Collusive Management
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free