Sen. Robert Haynes Advocates Nullification

Topics: Law, United States Constitution, Constitution Pages: 1 (254 words) Published: November 9, 2014
Sen. Robert Haynes Advocates Nullification (1830)
The unconstitutional tax laws set forth by the government
Meeting of the senate
The President and the Senate, as well as others attending
To propose a nullification of unauthorized acts of Congress, especially in the case of unjust taxation Speaker
Sen. Robert Haynes

1. While easy to choose one or the other, it would be best stated that Haynes is more so on a fine line in between being for or against the union. He presents arguments that acknowledge the union and what it was made to stand for, yet he also states that with the assertion of tariffs upon the people, the government that the union stands to defend has overstepped the limits of their power. Daniel Webster Pleads for the Union (1830)

Webster’s views on the liberty and the union, as they should always be inseparable Occasion
Meeting of the Senate
The President and the Senate, as well as others attending
To propose that the law is constitutional in the sense that if it were not in the best interest of the people, the people themselves would propose an amendment to the constitution to prevent such a law from presiding over their daily lives Speaker

Daniel Webster
Defensive (also somewhat religious)

1. Webster denotes that liberty and Union are indeed compatible with the line, “Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable!” 2. Both argued that the people have the final say in how they are to be governed.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Advocate Essay
  • robert Essay
  • The Nullification Crisis Essay
  • Jury Nullification Essay
  • Robert Frost Essay
  • Advocate Act Essay
  • Advocates Act Essay
  • Essay on The Advocate

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free