The Developing Economies, XXXVII-4 (December 1999): 417–38
THE MALAYSIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS: ECONOMIC IMPACT AND RECOVERY PROSPECTS MOHAMED ARIFF SYARISA YANTI ABUBAKAR
I. INTRODUCTION to the crisis, Malaysia had been dubbed as one of the miracle economies in East Asia owing to its maintenance of high growth rates averaging 8.9 per cent during the period 1988–96 in addition to low inﬂation rate of about 3–4 per cent per year. Moreover, the increasing emphasis on manufacturing, and electronics in particular, ensured high employment rates for the country. From July 1997 however, Malaysia began attracting more international attention not for its extraordinary economic performance, but for its entanglement in a major regional economic crisis. At the outset, for the more pessimistic observers it was already doubtful whether Malaysia’s target to become a developed country by the year 2020 would still be achievable. After all, for the ﬁrst time in years, the external value of Malaysia’s currency, the ringgit, shrank by nearly 50 per cent while the stock market contracted by even more at about 60 per cent. The ringgit fell from an average of 2.42 to the U.S. dollar in April 1997 to an all-time low of 4.88 to the U.S. dollar in January 1998. The composite index (CI) of the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (KLSE) which had been the third largest stock exchange in the region after Tokyo and Hong Kong, fell precipitously from 1,077.3 points in June 1997 to 262.7 points on September 1, 1997. Between July 1997 and mid-January 1998, approximately U.S.$225 billion of share values were wiped off. Before long, the impact of the ﬁnancial crisis was being felt in the real sector as evidenced by business closures, retrenchments leading to high unemployment, and increasing inﬂation levels. For the ﬁrst time since 1985, the Malaysian economy experienced a recession, contracting by 6.7 per cent in 1998. By nearly all accounts, the current downturn is worse than that experienced by the country in 1985. The recession experienced in 1985 lasted for only one year with a mild 10 per cent contraction. Two years after the onset of the current crisis, the main problem is whether a similar recovery is will occur for Malaysia this time, or whether the crisis will last beyond 1999. Obviously, some positive signs suggest that the worst is over for the Malaysian economy, although this does not necessarily guarantee that Ma-
THE DEVELOPING ECONOMIES
laysia is out of danger yet. In the past two years the Malaysian government has resorted to different tactics to withstand the negative effects of the crisis. While some of the strategies employed have been successful, some others have failed. The aim of this paper, as the title suggests, is to examine the various impacts of the Asian economic crisis on the Malaysian economy, to analyze Malaysia’s recovery prospects in the future, as well as to highlight some of the key challenges facing Malaysia on the road to sustained recovery. The paper begins by describing the genesis of the ﬁnancial crisis in Malaysia and then proceeds to outline the various policy responses of the Malaysian government. In the subsequent section, a snapshot of the crisis’ impact on the economy is provided. Malaysia’s prospects for recovery and the challenges associated with ensuring sustainable future growth are dealt with in the ﬁnal section. II. THE FINANCIAL CRISIS IN MALAYSIA
In mid-May 1997, the Thai baht came under severe pressure from speculative attacks. The ringgit was also not spared, and came under severe selling pressure. Bank Negara Malaysia’s (the central bank of Malaysia) immediate response was to intervene in the foreign exchange market to uphold the value of the ringgit. Bank Negara valiantly upheld the value of the ringgit for about a week before it ﬁnally was forced to ﬂoat the ringgit on July 14. By that time, the bank had already lost close to U.S.$1.5 billion in the effort to prop up the...
References: Abubakar, Syarisa Yanti. 1999. “Migrant Labour in Malaysia: Impacts and Implications of the Asian Economic Crisis.” Paper presented at the ISEAS-World Bank Workshop on the Social Impact of the Asian Crisis, June 30, at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore. Ariff, Mohamed, and Syarisa Yanti Abubakar. 1999. “Post-crisis Reforms and International Cooperation: The Case of Malaysia,” Paper presented at the Conference on Southeast Asian Trade and Economics: Domestic Reforms and International Cooperation, March 4–6, at the East-West Center, Honolulu. Ariff, Momamed, et al. 1998. Currency Turmoil and the Malaysian Economy: Genesis, Prognosis and Response. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Institute of Economic Research. Athukorala, Premachandra. 1998. “Swimming against the Tide: Crisis Management in Malaysia,” ASEAN Economic Bulletin 15, no. 3: 281–89. Chin, T. S. 1999. “Two Approaches to Restructuring.” Edge (Kuala Lumpur), May 3: 12– 13. Lopez, L. 1999. “After Controls, Malaysia’s Focus Blurs.” Asian Wall Street Journal, June 17: 1 and 10. Malaysia, Prime Minister’s Department, Economic Planning Unit (Malaysia, EPU). 1999. “White Paper—The Status of the Malaysian Economy.” Paper tabled at the Malaysian Parliament on April 6. Malaysian Institute of Economic Research (MIER). 1999a. Malaysian Economic Outlook 1999–2000. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Institute of Economic Research. ———. 1999b. Currency Control Measures Survey Results. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Institute of Economic Research. Saker, Neil. 1999. “High-Quality Growth Expected,” Edge (Kuala Lumpur), April 19: 12.
THE DEVELOPING ECONOMIES
Soesastro, Hadi. 1998. “Innovation and Technological Change: Southeast Asian Responses to Globalisation.” Paper presented at Institute of Southeast Asian Studies 30th Anniversary Conference, July 31–August 1, Singapore. Teoh, D. 1999. “Long Road Ahead.” Edge (Kuala Lumpur), April 12: S1.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document